Abstract
The authors regret to report several corrections identified after publication of the above-mentioned article. These corrections do not affect the thermodynamic modelling, methodology, or the scientific conclusions of the study. However, some numerical values and graphical representations require adjustment for consistency.In the Nomenclature section, the unit for the parameter “Additional power in the turbogenerator” W˙add,TG was incorrectly stated.In the Nomenclature section, the unit for the parameter “Area per unit power output” APR was incorrectly stated.In the Nomenclature section, the unit for the parameter “Annual operating time” top,AN was incorrectly stated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 141280 |
| Journal | Energy |
| Volume | 359 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 15 Sep 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Technical-economic evaluation of application scenarios of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) as a solution to the cogeneration deficit in a sugar plant” [Energy 313 (2024) 133785]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver